A. All notices required for the proposed installation have been given.

B. The proposed facility has been designed and located in compliance with all applicable provisions of this chapter.

C. If applicable, the applicant has demonstrated its inability to locate on existing infrastructure.

D. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence supporting the applicant’s claim that it has the right to enter the public right-of-way pursuant to state or federal law, or the applicant has entered into a franchise agreement with the city permitting them to use the public right-of-way.

E. The applicant has demonstrated the proposed installation is designed such that the proposed installation represents the least intrusive means possible and is supported by factual evidence and a meaningful comparative analysis to show that all alternative locations and designs identified in the application review process were technically infeasible or not available. (Ord. 676 §1(8), 2016).